For the half-year to 31 December 2014, the IPKat's regular team is supplemented by contributions from guest bloggers Rebecca Gulbul, Lucas Michels and Marie-Andrée Weiss.

Regular round-ups of the previous week's blogposts are kindly compiled by Alberto Bellan.

Friday, 24 February 2012

Breaking news: Sky's no limit for Karen Murphy

This Kat has just been listening to a BBC Radio 4 interview with pub landlady Karen Murphy, in the wake of the announcement that she has now obtained a court ruling in her favour.  According to the BBC website:
"A pub landlady has won her court fight with the English Premier League over using a Greek TV decoder to screen games. Karen Murphy has paid nearly £8,000 in fines and costs for using the cheaper decoder in her Portsmouth pub to bypass controls over match screening. But she took her case to the European Court of Justice (ECJ: on which see the IPKat here).

It found partly in her favour, and now the High Court in London has also found in her favour.

The case has been closely watched [not by TV viewers, alas] as it could trigger a major shake-up in the way football TV rights are sold, and potentially pave the way to cheaper viewing of foreign broadcasts for fans of top-flight English games.

Ms Murphy has spent six years fighting a prosecution for showing live football at the Red White and Blue pub without a Sky subscription. Instead of using Sky, on which it costs £700 a month to see Premier League matches, she used the Greek TV station Nova, which has the rights to screen the games in Greece, and which cost her £800 a year.

She took her fight for the right to use the cheaper provider to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) which ruled in October 2011 that having an exclusive system was "contrary to EU law".

The High Court in London on Friday [in a judgment not available on BAILII at the time of posting this blog] ruled that Karen Murphy's appeal over using the decoder to bypass controls over match screening must be allowed.

But a judge made clear that the other complex issues regarding the wider legality of screening matches would have to be decided "at a later date". ...".
This Kat was most impressed with Karen Murphy's ability to discuss and explain the legal and factual background of the case as well as the effect of today's ruling. Indeed, her explanation compared favourably with that of most of the law students which he has had the pleasure of teaching in the past. But then, that's only to be expected. Everyone knows that English law students learn more in the friendly environment of a pub than they do from lectures, and Karen Murphy has spent far more time in bars than they have ...

1 comment:

Gentoo said...

Oh, come on Jeremy (c.f. sense of humour failure discussions, passim)

We know she is being briefed but good luck to her, it turns out shes's no pussy...

It's taking up a large chunk of her life. It's an important exploration of the relationship between IP rights (aka sanctioned monopolies) and competition law, as one or other of the Kats has discussed already.

And in all of that you missed the opportunity to suggest she was a barista, keep up...

Subscribe to the IPKat's posts by email here

Just pop your email address into the box and click 'Subscribe':